According to at least one of the Webster's Dictionaries, a law is defined as: "That which is not subject to change in its given parameters." In other words, a law is an absolute unless changed by the one's who made the law. Then, it may be repealed like "Prohibition", amended, or modified in some way. This makes sense when one doesn't want to be governed purely by anarchy or emotional dynamics. The law can be counted on to provide clarity of matters that may evoke great depths of emotion but it will not be moved nor is it supposed to be moved. It has been codified after accounting for all factors pertaining to the issues while applying previous law and experience by men of wisdom and understanding.
We can also say that law institutes logic that cannot be swayed by an emotional factor. Rather, it is understood that it is (ideally) the "letter of the law" with the accounting for of the "spirit of the law" so that is fair and just for all. If we have the letter of the law only, then there is an inflexible tyranny foisted upon the people. While the law is, by and large, inflexible, the spirit of the law must be accounted for lest there be injustice. In any case, it is not emotional nor is it supposed to be.
The purpose here is to point out that what has been stated is an absolute that has been the course of wisdom and reason for millennia. Since the beginning of time "truth" has been observed by the vast majority of thinkers (certain philosophers excepted) as being law and therefore absolute. The best example is God's word because it is "the truth" and it never changes. By definition it is, therefore, law. Some of our current laws are direct descendants of "Hammurabi's Code" (ca. 1790 BC). This is the desired and proven way for establishing and maintaining the law of the land that is supposed to account for a peaceful and orderly society that is without oppression and tyranny as such.
But, there is a fly in this ointment. This is an immutable social truth unless you are a liberal. Liberals abhor bottom-line truth and do not allow it to interfere with their deceitful and utterly corrupt Marxist doctrines. It has been demonstrated on a national level as of late that there are federal, state, and local laws that just aren't effectual because liberals just don't like them and refuse to enforce them (or allow them to be enforced). They simply ignore them tacitly intending to subvert the law. They, likewise, gainsay and oppose anyone who would dare to be patriotic and enforce them.
It is of great note that this is largely due to the fact that liberals reject all absolutes anyway. That's why they reject both truth and law and make them entirely subjective and irresolute. It leaves them with rabidly defending such things as the indefensible position that "My truth is better than yours!". At that point it is a matter of fighting, kicking, screaming, decrying, gainsaying, lying, and smearing to defeat the opposition. They can then define "truth" as they please. Conscience and civility are not allowed to attend these bouts. It is little wonder that they have earned the sobriquet "loony liberals". They are on logical black ice at all times.
Such liberal philosophy introduces the decidedly unstable factor of emotion that determines to undermine the efficacy of law. It purposes to override the establishment (i.e. the established law) by using demagoguery as a key motivator to either change or subvert the law to their standards. It never seems to dawn on the employers of such a philosophy that, if what they had was good and truthful, people would come to them rather than having to be brutally forced (e.g. Lenin), and/or deceived (Hitler), into accepting what they tender.
While there is any number of examples, this specific reference is regarding immigration law which has been established for the protection of the people of this country and its sovereignty. Now, let's tie this into liberalism with more focus.
In effect, immigration law means nothing to liberals. That also means that the Constitution of the United States is a worthless scrap of paper to them because it is the law of the land. Therefore, immigration law of America has been rendered without teeth and ineffectual because of their subversion of the law and Americans are suffering brutally because of their disdain.
"What about the "Border Patrol". Aren't they allowed to do their job?" some would ask. This is where the next principle of socialism comes into play. "Change everything except what is apparent or presented to the masses". It does appear that the "Border Patrol" is enforcing the law. But, to what degree are the allowed to enforce the law? Seriously ... does catching a (comparatively) few illegals while millions are unchallenged prove any kind of effective enforcement? Doesn't the lack of a protective wall or not positioning Army and/or Marine troops at the border a higher proof that America's leaders are traitors who are prohibiting enforcement of the laws of the land? Doesn't the almost unhindered drug trafficking along the border and the absolute refusal to protect our citizen's from drug lords smack of dereliction of duty?
To aid their cause, they force emotional attachment to the plight of (illegal) immigrants using it to instigate class and a (presumed) race conflict. In fact, they level the charge of "racism" to those who demand law enforcement and who want to save their country from a mass invasion of illegals. "Mexican" is a nationality and not a race but such facts are ignored. The sobriquet "illegal aliens" sticks in their crop so political correctness is enforced for just such matters. To mitigate facts and truth, they are now "undocumented workers".
In carrying out this practice of distortion, they make "good" appear "evil" and "evil" appear to be "good". In other words, being a patriot and loving one's country is considered a "hate crime". In their thinking, one is supposed be sorry and ashamed that he is an American and should apologize for his existence. It is also considered being "racist" if he doesn't surrender his land to the invading armies. No, there is no actual rationale or logic to their thinking at all. But, after years and even decades of (soviet style) brainwashing, any lie becomes "truth" to be defended with alacrity. To them, the end justifies the means (including national suicide). If they were alive today, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Marx, and Mao would be proud of them.
They do this while trying to maintain some diaphanous moral high ground by clamoring about the greatness of their "spread the wealth" "hate the rich" socialism that somehow entitles people to break the law and dine freely at the table of the rich Americans (which, when compared to Mexico, is almost all Americans). They tie in the untenable socialist egalitarian position that every is equal but don't bother to say that it's their job to bring the middle-class down so that everyone is equal: equally poor and equally dependent upon the government, and equally enslaved to totalitarianism and without the cover of our Constitution.
If anyone should think that they care one whit about the middle class, they need only do a bit of homework to discover that liberals are in full march to confiscate more than 75% of the wage earner’s paycheck (it’s actually near that now with all taxes considered). That, incidentally, is precisely the tax rate in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (the USSR being as far from a true republic as a duck is from being a dinosaur).
Then they scream "diversity is best" while anyone with only a few brain cells to rub together knows that "divide and conquer" is the very first rule of warfare (and they most surely are at war with America). By demanding non-assimilating illegal Mexicans and Hispanics (who are conquering the US without firing a shot), Americans in some parts of the country are now the minority population. They conveniently overlook "E Pluribus Unum" which means "out of many, one". It was never our founding father's intent to "take one people and turn them into many splinter groups that have no commonality at all and thereby destroying the nation". Ah, but there are those pesky facts again.
God Bless and Enjoy ...
