AGAIN, we'd be better off with the inmates ...
running the asylum, instead of the "intelligentsia"!!!
Stand at EASE!!!
It's getting worse, just about when you think it couldn't.
Un-COVER!!! (Silent, individual prayer or contemplation.) In Jesus'
Name I pray, Hooaah!!!
COVER!!! Take SEATS!!!
I still chuckle, with irony, at the cartoon of Daffy Duck saying,
"Every day of my life, I have to add
someone else to the list of people who can just KISS MY A$$!!! Here
are a couple who may have made my list.
There was a recent news story about a lady who is the "senior
diversity officer", at a university.
My jaw was so far down that my ears couldn't hear the name of the
The story was that the lady signed a petition (at her church) in
support of traditional marriage.
Apparently someone (#1 cesspool sludge) finked her out, to the college
administration who placed her on admin. leave, pending a decision as
to her eligibility to continue in her job [which
qualifies the admin. person(s???) as (#2) cesspool sludge].
Now MAYBE the report to the admin. person (?) was just an innocent
comment & not a malicious act & MAYBE the action of the admin. person
(?) was just done to demonstrate that the admin. was doing its job &
will return the lady to duty.
That said (to play devil's advocate) we all know that the left is
malicious, vindictive and evil, so the smart $$$ is betting that we're
looking at a case of REALLY stinky cesspool sludge,
(reporting person [?] and admin. person [?] ) and that they WILL can this lady.
The problem has been (& still is) that the libs & left welcome
diversity, as long as it is THEIR
kind of diversity. If you depart from their diversity model, you are
subhuman and not deserving of ANY consideration.
Witness the fact that conservatives have such a difficult time being
booked as speakers, on college campuses (campi?) and have been
cancelled when their conservatism has become known AND that they have
been cancelled "for their own safety" instead of the admin. people (?)
dealing with the threats.
All of this takes us down the slippery slope toward the "thought
police" of "1984".
As seen in the recent Pres./ V.P. debates and in the failed socialist
governments, around the
world, socialism is not able to stand up to the light of exposure of
its flaws. The only way it can succeed, to any extent, is to repress
On the other side of the coin, I am happy to report that a school bus
driver was removed from the position for telling a student that his
mother should have aborted him, because she is a Romney supporter.
Had the driver said this to ME, I would have had no difficulty
handling it, but a child should not be subjected to this type of hate
speech and I applaud the school district for its prompt and decisive
action. I just hope they don't cave in, if the "american communists
living under cover" (AKA a.c.l.u.) threaten a lawsuit. I'd LOVE to be
on that jury.
Speaking of the presidential (?) debates, which only merit the name
because Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan were Presidential and Vice
Presidential, respectively. o(WHATTA)bummer and joe (bite me)
revealed themselves, fully, to the American public.
o(WHATTA)bummer was petty, prevaricating and prissy, while Mitt Romney
was poised, prepared and Presidential.
joe (bite me) was irritating, irrational and ill-suited to being a
heartbeat away from carrying the "atomic football". BRRRR!!! That
scares the he77 out of me.
o(WHATTA)bummer is bad enough, but I believe his enlightened
self-interest (feel free to insert greed and/or self-aggrandizement)
will keep him from unleashing a world-wide holocaust that would
interfere with his position as the "imperial obama", while joe (bite
me) is just, plain nutso.
Something to think about, an article by a Black Columnist, prior to
the 2008 election.
[[[[Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun
It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts
in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the
first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the
first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of
America will be a first.
We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge
every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should
be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender.
Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we
need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his
policies and his politics.
The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee
until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the
frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at
Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's
the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.
Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator
in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie
Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.
Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric
is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise
our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness,
and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in
the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in
a beauty pageant.
Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue,
to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more
defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.'
Start with national security, since the president's most important
duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked
about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting
without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy
Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering
and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was
off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever
taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s.
Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of
those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our
national security at risk.
Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care
system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements,
created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more
goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a
life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to
raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes.
How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes.
Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His
solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother
on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open
a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says
that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked'
- hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and pr
omises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction
on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret
Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual
leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that
direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban -
ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood,
and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.
The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs.
Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people
don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision
of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree
with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the
country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandon ing any
But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he
is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be
the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's
radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the
left of Mrs. Clinton.
It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of
firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to
be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational
This is all I have of the column. Now THAT is someone for whom I could VOTE!!!!
He has more sense, in his pinkie than the entire (un)democratic party.
Now, let's have some clarification of nomenclature.
There may be a FEW Democratic people in the dim-o-cr-ass party, but
remember: "Democrat-IC" is a process and the proper way of doing the
business of "WE, THE PEOPLE..."
No intelligent and honorable person can call the party of, "We have to
pass the bill, so you can find out what's in it." or the party that
wants to dis-arm "WE, THE PEOPLE..." "Democrat-IC".
A "Democrat-IC" party isn't going to tell you what to do, 48 hrs per
day. I know it's only 24, but they try to extend their control waaayy
A "Democrat-IC" party is TRULY government of, by and FOR, "WE, THE
PEOPLE...", instead a
group of elitists who want to GOVERN YOU, because YOU are too STUUPID
to LIVE, without their control over your lives.
The choice, in this vital election, is clear. You have the party that
SUPPORTED The Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil Rights Act, the
party of Lincoln, the Republican Party, with which I don't always (but
mostly) agree, or you have the party that fought FOR slavery and
AGAINST the Civil Rights Act and wants "WE, THE PEOPLE..." to be
un-armed SHEEPLE, so that they can violate their oaths of office AND
the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution AND your
God-given unalienable rights.
As long as the Republican Party is the closest thing to a
Constitutional Party that has any hope of counter-acting the evil of
the left (which is enacted by their democrat brainwashed drones), I
will continue to support the Republicans, even though I am,
philosophically, a LIBERTARIAN!!!
Supporting my philosophical beliefs, to the detriment of the country,
makes NO SENSE!!!
As long as I have 2 half-wits to rub together, I will continue to make
reasoned decisions that benefit the country and the world of which God
gave me stewardship
As for me and my house, we will follow the Lord and shovel out the
On your FEET!!!
Heavenly Father, as we come down to the last days of this campaign, we
ask Your guidance for our electorate. We ask for the wisdom to set
aside any personal agendas and act in the best interest of our country
and the world. We see how our present regime has us on a catastrophic
course and ask Your help to reverse it. We always ask for Your
protection of our guardians and that Your Will be done. In all things
I thank You and praise You and especially for the Gift and Sacrifice
of Your Son, Jesus Christ, in Whose Name I pray, HOOAAHHH!!!
Sgt, Mack out, leaving the air and closing station.