Stand at EASE!!!
Those are 4 of the STOOPIDEST (is that a word?) most hypocritical
words I have EVER had the misfortune to have to hear or read. What
would have happened if a bunch of red-necks had gone around beating up
blacks & said, "This is for Reginald Denney"?
I'll tell you what: The lib/left/media would have screamed "Bloody
murder!!!", as would all of the decent folks, red, yellow, black,
white, orange, chartreuse and purple!!! This ONE time, the
lib/left/media would have been RIGHT!!!
More to come, Un-COVER!!! (Silent prayer or contemplation.)
COVER!!! Take SEATS!!!
The problem with the media and the current regime (for whom they are
unabashed cheerleaders) is that they are so far left that they can
hardly EVER be right.
I mean a stopped clock is right twice a day and they can't even equal THAT!!!
This month (as Officer of the Month for the Porterville Area
Republican Assembly [PARA]) I invited an instructor from the Rankin
Field Firing Range, in Tulare, Ca. to speak to us on the 2nd
Amendment, since the group already knows my views and I thought a more
authoritative voice would be helpful.
I'm afraid I stole some of his thunder (totally unintentionally) when
I asked the members to remember one thing, when listening to him.
I said, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a
free state..." "Now, what have I said?" No one answered so I said,
"Nothing, I have said nothing, because that is not a complete
sentence. It doesn't express a complete thought, but now I say, 'The
right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'
That fulfills the requirements for a stand-alone statement and is,
therefore, the meat and intent of the 2nd Amendment."
Our speaker agreed and clarified that the first phrase was an
explanatory phrase, to establish the founder's intent that the
citizenry was to be armed, so that they could be called, at a moment's
notice, to deal with any emergency.
This practice continues, today, when police may deputize citizens to
deal with situations that exceed the ready resources of the police.
The added benefit is that the "Organized Militia", the standing
military is kept in check by the knowledge that a "Military Coup", in
an armed society, would be a hazardous venture.
Some of the attendees began asking questions about the Zimmerman case
and the practical aspects of the "Stand Your Ground" laws, so the
speaker asked if there were any more questions about the 2nd
Amendment, it being very clearly stated, and (hearing none) proceeded
to answer the questions, not as am attorney, but as someone who deals
with the practical aspects of self-defense.
Speaking for myself and not as an officer of PARA or on behalf of this
publication,
it is my FERVENT hope that these cowardly gangs of punks (who are
using Trayvon Martin as an excuse to beat up white, yellow, red [or
any other color of] people) will run into some people who will reply,
"This is for ME!!!" and bust some caps in their yellow, hypocritical
butts.
Maybe THAT will show the hypocrite-in-chief that he should have kept
his big, hypocritical, leftist mouth shut as he has been inciting
black people (the racist [possibly] mentally defective
ones) to commit crimes.
Wait! What am I thinking? I'm imputing the ability to exercise
rational, non-leftist, non-prejudiced thought to a die-hard, race
baiting, opportunistic cesspool sludge!!!
S'pose he'll ever be prosecuted for it? Naw. He's kin to "slick
willie", so slimy that nothing sticks.
Sorry!!! I must have been deranged!!!
In addition to all of their other anti-American activities, the left
is continuing to push for the "dream act", whereby illegal aliens can
get taxpayer money for education and, then, get priority
status to become citizens. Now, understand, I'm no more xenophobic
than any other true patriot.
Part of my family came here as "furriners", and were abused like so
many others. ("No Irish need apply".) Part of my family was on the
"Trail of Tears", as part of the Cherokee Nation and abused like so
many other Native Americans.
I do, however, have a patriotic and logical objection to paying to
educate lawbreakers and, then, giving them citizenship, giving them
rewards at both ends.
What I WOULD WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT is a direct path to citizenship
for anyone who honorably completes a regular term of service in our
military.
I'd be willing to request permission to attend their swearing in
ceremony, in full Class "A" dress
uniform and salute them, at the conclusion.
WHOOP!!! WHOOP!!! STAND BY FOR A BULLETIN!!!
If I understood this correctly, there was a novel news item that
causes me to have to apologize to kalifornia. Allegedly, this tea (?)
manufacturer decided to test people's honesty, by setting out untended
"honor" dispensers. The idea being that people would serve themselves
and voluntarily pay. When the news person asked where the audience
expected the least honest people to have been, I said kalifornia, as
everyone expects low morals here.
I guess I shoulda known better. We don't call if the district of
criminals for nothing. The nation's CAPITOL was the least honest,
about paying for the tea.
Knowing that, I'd bet that the politickians were the worst offenders.
They take an oath of office that most of them intend to (and do )
violate before the ink is dry on their signatures and spend the rest
of their time in the regime filling their pockets at taxpayer's
expense, then run for re-election, so they can do it again and retire
to be influence peddlers, by corrupting the incoming class of
criminals, some of whom just MIGHT be honest but are 3-D.O.A.
(Debauched, Defiled and Dishonored, On Arrival).
It is widely understood that "honest lawyer" is just about the epitome
of oxymorons, now I'm not saying you CAN'T find one, just that if all
of the honest ones were put on one side of an island and the dishonest
ones on the other, the chances of the island remaining upright are so
slim that I wouldn't even make a throw-away bet on it.
Among the worst tragedies of the situation is that the dishonest ones
are so foul and so numerous that there would be "ring around" the
shoreline, for years and everyone knows a
shark won't attack a crooked lawyer (professional courtesy) so the
percentage of crooks to honest would be further tilted to the crooks.
All of that said, the overwhelming number of lawyers who are
politickians makes it hard for an honest (non-lawyer) crook to make a
living. The lawyers don't like anyone else stealing, as it cuts into
their profits.
There is an old saying that the reason there are so many hippie-types
in san francisco and so many lawyers in sacra-mental is because san
francisco got first choice.
Anyway, 'nuff said about the (choke) ethics of the legal "profession"
(AKA perversion) as the evidence just keeps piling up, like manure.
Again, I don't tar ALL lawyers with the same brush. I've known a few
of the hold-outs from the corruption. They (usually) aren't very rich
& fight constantly to retain their integrity and they have my respect
and sympathy.
As usual, this class was intended to go in one direction and (because
of events) attained a life of its own.
The uncovered topics will just have to compete for room in a future class.
On your FEET!!! Un-COVER!!!
Heavenly Father, we are still muddling through and thank You for Your
blessings and guidance
that allow us to do better. Please continue to bless and guide us and
in all things I thank and praise You and, especially, for the Gift and
Sacrifice of your Son, Jesus Christ, my Lord and Savior, in Whose Name
I pray, HOOAAHHH!!!
COVER!!! Dis-MISSED!!!
Sgt. Mack, out, leaving the air and closing station.
